[reccom] Proposals

Terry Sadler sadler at iveracity.com
Sat May 24 07:38:27 MDT 2008


I think your interpreting it right, at least that's the way I see it.  
Thanks for keeping us on track and trying to move these proposals along, 
Milt.

Terry

Milt Moody wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> It looks to me that if Kris's proposal to vote on all records using the same criteria (no special treatment for first-state record) that David's proposal, to add another voting category for records that don't meet the first-state guidelines, would not be necessary.  I'm I interpreting this correctly?
>
> If so, we many have to vote for David's proposal with the condition that it only apply if Kris's proposal is NOT accepted.  Does this sound like that way we should approach this?
>
> Thanks,
> Milt
>
>
>       
> _______________________________________________
> reccom mailing list
> reccom at utahbirds.org
> http://utahbirds.org/mailman/listinfo/reccom
>
>
>   



More information about the reccom mailing list