[reccom] Proposed Bylaw Change

[Rick Fridell]

Hello All,

Terry wrote "Is it too late to consider this bylaw change given where we are
in voting to replace them?"

I'm very sorry I've been out of touch and did not address this sooner.  When
I went to the voting page, I was sincerely surprised that neither Ron or
Mark were on the ballot. I honestly did not realize that the bylaws were
written to prevent them from remaining on the committee.

If the committee supports the change, and shares Terry and my concerns, I
would also like to contact Mark and Ron and see if they are willing to
continue to volunteer their time, and if possible put them on the ballot and
re-vote.

What do others think?

Rick


PS I also realized right after I hit send that letter d. under the proposed
changes should also be changed to read:

d.	THREE or FOUR Members will be up for reselection or replacement each year
(i.e. THREE in year on, FOUR in year two.)



-----Original Message-----
From: reccom-bounces at utahbirds.org
[mailto:reccom-bounces at utahbirds.org]On Behalf Of Terry Sadler
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2008 9:03 PM
To: Utah Bird Records Committee
Subject: [reccom] Proposed Bylaw Change


I support the suggested bylaw change proposed by Rick.   I have been
fretting about losing the caliber of review given by Mark and Ron.
While the current candidates to fill their vacancies are knowledgeable,
they lack the depth of experience that Mark and Ron have provided over
the years they have served on the committee.

Terry
_______________________________________________
reccom mailing list
reccom at utahbirds.org
http://utahbirds.org/mailman/listinfo/reccom