[reccom] 2 records to 2nd round, 5 completed

[Rick Fridell]

Hello Everyone,
I really don't think there is a need for everyone to vote again on the
California Condor record.  Clearly this population is not yet established,
and as David pointed out, each individual is well monitored and studied.
The point of my vote was that none of the available options seemed to fit
this record. Clearly, California Condors were observed and they were well
documented by the observer, thus I proposed voting "Accept, establishment of
introduced population questionable".  So I propose we archive the record as
is.


Regards,

Rick

-----Original Message-----
From: reccom-bounces at utahbirds.org
[mailto:reccom-bounces at utahbirds.org]On Behalf Of Milt Moody
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2007 7:51 AM
To: Records Committee
Subject: [reccom] 2 records to 2nd round, 5 completed


Greetings,

Two records have been sent to a second round and 5 others where
completed (4 accepted, 1 not accepted).

The comments for the records are now available on the review page:

http://www.utahbirds.org/ReviewBirds/UnderReview.htm

Thanks,
Milt



____________________________________________________________________________
________
Yahoo! oneSearch: Finally, mobile search
that gives answers, not web links.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/mobileweb/onesearch?refer=1ONXIC
_______________________________________________
reccom mailing list
reccom at utahbirds.org
http://utahbirds.org/mailman/listinfo/reccom