[reccom] 2nd round comments / checklist

[Ron Ryel]

Milt, Thanks for agreeing to identify which accepted species do not have 
physical evidence. I think this will be most helpful for observers when 
documenting rare species (i.e., get that photo!). 

We should designate the species as "lacking physical evidence" and not use 
the term "unverified" (too loaded).

Best wishes, Ron

On 12 Jan 2007 at 8:32, Milt Moody wrote:

> Review Page:
> http://www.utahbirds.org/ReviewBirds/UnderReview.htm
> 
> I must have forgotten to upload the comment files after Merrill voted.
> Sorry about that.  They're uploaded now.  Thanks to Rick for pointing
> that out.
> 
> The "unverified species" tag should be easy to do.  Good suggestion.
> 
> Thanks,
> Milt
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> ______________ Food fight? Enjoy some healthy debate in the Yahoo!
> Answers Food & Drink Q&A.
> http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545367
> _______________________________________________ reccom mailing list
> reccom at utahbirds.org http://utahbirds.org/mailman/listinfo/reccom

-- 
     
Dr. Ronald J. Ryel
Assistant Professor
Department of Wildland Resources
Utah State University
5230 Old Main Hill
Logan, UT  84322-5230
USA

ron.ryel at usu.edu
range at cc.usu.edu
435-797-8119
435-797-3796 (fax)