[reccom] listing of unverified species

[sadler]

I support Ron's Idea.  I guess this is what I was after in my proposal 
several months ago.  This will work just as well if not better, and as 
Rick points out it's simple and straightforward.
Cheers,  Terry

Ron Ryel wrote:
> Milt, Attached is an old state list from Oregon that has designations for 
> species which have physical evidence and for those with accepted sight 
> records, but no physical evidence. I would like to see us do something 
> similar with the Utah list as per our bylaws. What do others think, and is this 
> possible to do with our records (it seems like we could do this rather easily).
> Best wishes, Ron
>
>   
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> The following section of this message contains a file attachment
> prepared for transmission using the Internet MIME message format.
> If you are using Pegasus Mail, or any other MIME-compliant system,
> you should be able to save it or view it from within your mailer.
> If you cannot, please ask your system administrator for assistance.
>
>    ---- File information -----------
>      File:  obrclist.pdf
>      Date:  9 Jan 2007, 0:02
>      Size:  27111 bytes.
>      Type:  Unknown
>   
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> reccom mailing list
> reccom at utahbirds.org
> http://utahbirds.org/mailman/listinfo/reccom