[reccom] listing of unverified species

[Rick Fridell]

Hello Everyone,
I'm completely supportive. I think this is a very good idea.... simple and
straightforward.

Also Kris, welcome to the committee.  I look forward to working with you.

And finally, Milton, the second round records of several species have
Merrill listed as having voted (e.g. Auklet, Mag. Hummingbird, etc.), but do
not show his comments.  As he was the only one to vote to accept many of
these, I'm curious to see his rationale, prior to submitting my second round
votes.

Yrs,
Rick




-----Original Message-----
From: reccom-bounces at utahbirds.org
[mailto:reccom-bounces at utahbirds.org]On Behalf Of Ron Ryel
Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 12:06 AM
To: Utah Bird Records Committee
Subject: [reccom] listing of unverified species


Milt, Attached is an old state list from Oregon that has designations for
species which have physical evidence and for those with accepted sight
records, but no physical evidence. I would like to see us do something
similar with the Utah list as per our bylaws. What do others think, and is
this
possible to do with our records (it seems like we could do this rather
easily).
Best wishes, Ron

--

Dr. Ronald J. Ryel
Assistant Professor
Department of Wildland Resources
Utah State University
5230 Old Main Hill
Logan, UT  84322-5230
USA

ron.ryel at usu.edu
range at cc.usu.edu
435-797-8119
435-797-3796 (fax)